Report
A reader identifies the affected page, disputed content, and relevant official source.
Transparency
This page explains how possible errors are checked and records material corrections to this unofficial presentation.
If this site differs from an official COA document, the official document controls. Review the original files on the Audit Report PDFs page.
A reader identifies the affected page, disputed content, and relevant official source.
The site operator compares the presentation with the official COA PDF, including nearby status labels, management comments, and auditor rejoinders.
A confirmed presentation error is fixed in the site’s central dataset or source content.
A material correction is added to the public log with its source document and report page.
This log covers confirmed, material errors in this website’s presentation. It does not modify or correct an official COA report.
Tables 5–6 and Note 4's bank-account identities support these fund labels. Table 3 reverses them; its conflicting presentation remains in the dataset. The overall 19 checks / ₱2,294,313.33 is unchanged.
The monthly schedule's ₱2,228,341.79 deductions less ₱2,180,914.04 remittances equal ₱47,427.75. The previous subtotal measures current-year unremitted amounts before prior-year payments. This completes the August correction at the schedule level.
The four source rows sum to the calculated amounts and a ₱750,000.00 variance. The report's first two printed totals instead differ by ₱850,000.00. No source row was changed.
The PDF note's total is ₱49,300.00 below its line-item sum. The financial-position statement retains its own reported ₱257,247,587.76 comparative balance.
Restoring the source row makes the comparative detail sum to the unchanged reported total of ₱6,424,367.60.
Adding SCBAA rows by class recovers the full amounts. With capital outlay of ₱73,004,439.04, they equal the unchanged audited appropriation total of ₱347,760,319.21. The executive chart's printed labels and conflicting total remain in the dataset.
Counting and summing the 84 printed rows gives different results from the narrative counts and printed total. Age counts use the source's '3 Years & Above' labels. The printed finding amount remains the reported amount.
The SCBAA cells are blank and Finding 2 explicitly identifies the omission. A blank disclosure cannot establish zero appropriations. The second audit-opinion basis has no monetary amount.
The condensed statement prints the previous value. Appendix C.1 and the equation ₱12,572,226.13 beginning cash + ₱673,594.35 = ₱13,245,820.48 ending cash support the corrected presentation. The official report itself is unchanged.
The previous website total added account balances, proposed adjustments, total asset populations, and unrealized revenue. COA does not state that aggregate, and the component measures are not additive.
The reports cite account balances, appropriations, transaction amounts, and year-end liabilities for different purposes. COA does not aggregate or define those measures as comparable losses, disallowances, or audit exceptions.
The corrected value is stated in Finding 13 and equals deductions of ₱21,999,116.20 less remittances of ₱20,399,362.23. Appendix F's printed grand total combines differently defined GSIS and Pag-IBIG measures and remains disclosed as a source conflict.
The printed total excludes the table's negative ₱5,275,977.46 transportation-equipment difference. The portal now shows both the COA-reported amount and the complete row arithmetic without altering the official report.
COA prints 89.84%. Dividing its stated finding total of ₱1,012,776,538.24 by audited total assets of ₱1,130,821,080.03 gives 89.56%, so the two values are now explicitly separated.
The section now uses one source presentation consistently. Note 11's ₱18,982,472.08 and its resulting ₱240,584,912.83 line-item total remain documented as the conflicting note presentation.
Publication checks confirm the following conditions:
These checks cannot prove that every extracted value matches the source PDF. Important figures still require human comparison with the official report and its surrounding notes.
Use the contact form to send the affected page, disputed content, official report title, page number, and a short explanation. A screenshot can help. The official PDF remains the controlling source.